Explain the Differences Between Panglosss Philosophy Essay Example for Free

Explain the Differences Between Panglosss Philosophy EssayPanglosss philosophy of life is that all is for the best in the best of all manageable worlds. This optimistic philosophy actually is the key element of Voltaires satire. Panglosss philosophy is against the ideas of the Enlightenment period. Pangloss believes that a powerful God had created the world and that, and so, the world essential be perfect. When creatures of the world, see something as wrong or evil, it is because they do not understand the ultimate good that result come out of it. Voltaire satirically shows the proofreader that Pangloss is not a believable character. Voltaire illustrates this by showing us that he keeps his optimistic archetype even when he is impris angiotensin converting enzymed. Pangloss ignores any evidence that contradicts his initial opinion. He also uses illogical arguments to support his beliefs. Panglosss philosophy tries to impose a passive attitude toward all that is wrong in th e world. If the world is the best one possible, then there is no land to make any effort to change things.Martin is more believable than Pangloss, not because he is more sophisticated, but because he is smarter and more likely to draw conclusions with which we can identify. Martin had been robbed by his wife and beaten by his son and deserted by his daughter and also lived financial set(p)backs, and therefore hes a pessimist whereas Pangloss is an optimist. He uses his experiences to judge the world whereas Pangloss was merely using a theory. As a result, Martin is more insightful than Pangloss to foresee events that go out happen.Even though Martins philosophy is more believable than Panglosss, hes still not good at predicting how some people will behave because his philosophy is coming from extreme pessimism. Therefore it might not be wrong to say that Voltaire is trying to prove that we need flexible thought in our lives based on real evidence. Both philosophers will ultimatel y fail because theres no room for exceptions in their beliefs. Candide starts his journey with the diverge of Panglosss belief of best of all possible worlds.Pangloss and Candide, suffer and witness a wide variety of horrors and tragedies together. During these tragedies, Panglosss s philosophy proves to be shadowy and even destructive at the end, because it prevents them from making realistic judgments. For example while Jacques was drowning, Pangloss doesnt let Candide save him by saying that the bay of Lisbon had been form for this Anabaptist to drown in. Also when Candide was buried under the rubble of the Lisbon earthquake, he asked for oil and wine because he was dying, but Pangloss ignored him and still tried to reason with the causes of the earthquake.At the end Candide rejects his philosophy of optimism and as he and his servant Cacambo travel and go through more horrors, Candide starts believing a pessimistic view of life. When Candide meets Martin, they set sail togethe r and Martin is just the opposite of Pangloss. He does not believe that everything is for the best in this world. Even though Candide tries to oppose Martin by talking close free will but it does not solve the problem of presence of evil in the world.In general, Martins arguments seem more reasonable than Panglosss ideas. But, like Pangloss, Martin believes so firmly in his own view of the world that he is not flexible and usually dismisses real evidence that contradicts his philosophy. When Candide cannot find Cunegonde, Martin shows the naughty influence of his pessimism. Instead of attempting to comfort his friend, Martin uses Candides distress to further confirm his own world-view. Just like Panglosss optimism, Martins pessimism also keeps him from taking scuttle to improve the world.